Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Mobility Management
In many power chair discussions,
“center-wheel drive” and “mid-wheel drive” are used almost
interchangeably. So what is the difference between the two
configurations?
Says Invacare Corp.’s Julie Jackson,
“Center-wheel drive means the distance from your footplate to the
middle of your drive tire and from the middle of the drive tire to the
rear caster is the exact same distance. Mid-wheel drive just means that
center-wheel-drive tire is somewhere in between the front and the rear.
It doesn’t mean it’s directly in the center.” While Jackson says
center-wheel drive is “more intuitive” for someone new to the
configurations, she adds, “They’re very similar (to learn).” The “feel”
of mid-wheel-drive can vary a bit from chair to chair and manufacturer
to manufacturer, Jackson contends, because the drive wheels aren’t
equidistant from front to back. For instance, she says, “If your drive
tires (on a mid-wheel-drive chair) are closer to the front, it can feel
a little bit like a front-wheel-drive product.”
Environmental Impacts on Power Bases
If a power chair’s seating system is all about meeting the client’s clinical needs, you could say the power base is much more about meeting the needs of the physical environments that the client navigates every day.
That may sound simple enough, but today’s typically active client requires a lot of versatility from a single power chair base.
“It’s really imperative that a variety of the most common environments that the user will encounter be carefully evaluated for access,” Verrett says. “Not just indoors, but also the surrounding property and the home, their work environment, transportation both public and personal, and other places they might visit on a common basis, like school or church, medical visits, that sort of thing. It’s really important that the user environments are determined and really well laid out.”
A basic checklist of environmental questions for a provider to ask a client could include the following:
• Home: How much turning room is there for a wheelchair indoors? How are doorways and entryways laid out? What is the outdoor property like, e.g., the distances and terrains to reach mailboxes, gardens, parking areas, etc.?
• Main daytime environments, such as work or school: How much floor space is there for turning around?
• Frequently visited locations in the community, including houses of worship, medical offices, homes of friends and family.
• Surrounding areas for all of the above: How far away are parking or drop-off areas from the buildings? Is the terrain between the parking areas and the buildings uneven, unpaved, etc.?
• Automotive transportation, either private or public, and other public transportation: What sizes of power chairs can be accommodated?
Verrett knows first hand how much a client’s environment can impact drivetrain choice.
“I have a (young client) who I did a power wheelchair for a long time ago when I was a provider in the Atlantic,” he recalls. “He had come from a rear-wheel-drive environment. We moved him to mid-wheel drive because he needed better accessibility to his vehicle and also his home. It was a slow transition for him, but once he committed to it and his family really adapted to the differences, it made accessibility much better for him when he moved to mid-wheel drive. His mom would let him in the kitchen because he wouldn’t smash up the cabinets, he was able to use the van that was donated to them, so mid-wheel drive really became a necessity for this particular individual, and they made that transition. It just took some time.”
Changing Power Bases Along the Way
That client example brings up another question: Over time, perhaps as a condition progresses or natural aging takes place, should clients consider changing drivetrain configurations?
“We typically don’t see that (too) much, where someone goes from one drive configuration to another,” Jackson says. “What we typically see as their disease progresses is that it’s usually addressed with different seating, not so much with the base…. What we do see is that if you go into center-wheel drive, you stick with center-wheel drive. If you go into rear-wheel drive, you stick with rear-wheel drive. Typically, even as the disease progresses, they’re not changing their frame design.”
Very young clients, Jackson adds, can be exceptions. Because many caregivers find rear-wheel-drive chairs easier to maneuver when their assistance is needed over curbs and obstacles, Jackson says, “When it comes to pediatrics (and) a child who is first going into a power chair, there actually is a lot of discussion out there” as to whether a rear-wheel-drive chair may be preferred.
“But then maybe later, as they get older and they’re going to school and then off to college, they may want to switch to a center-wheel drive,” she says.
For other clients, Jackson says, “Most of the times, when you go to a clinic, they are bringing out the center-wheel-drive chairs first. But every so often you see them bring out the rear-wheel or the front-wheel based upon the client’s home and where they’re going to be driving the chair, and then ultimately, what they feel the most comfortable is.”
Once clients find that “comfort zone,” most are quite reluctant to transition to another configuration, largely because the different power base types do drive differently and therefore “feel” different to the operator.
“A lot of children with muscular dystrophy, Duchenne’s, individuals from the VA, that population has come from rear-wheel drive, and that’s what they prefer,” Verrett says. “They continually look for that. Actually, when we try a different platform such as mid-wheel or front-wheel, they feel very out of sorts. It’s so different.”
That’s not to say that clients can’t learn to drive — and appreciate — a different drive configuration than the one they currently have. But the transition will take time and patience on the part of everyone involved, from client to provider to clinician to family members and other people in the environment.
“It’s been my experience that kids are more able to adapt to change depending on the situation they’re potentially faced with,” Verrett says.
Jackson says the transition time varies from child to child “from what I’ve heard from therapists. Some kids will just gravitate to it and make the change within a day; others can take a couple of weeks. But I think it is a change that someone does need to get used to and get accustomed to.”
A Very Individual Choice
There are definite tendencies related to today’s drivetrain choices: Center-/mid-wheel drive is the most prevalent power base, environment is key, clients don’t like changing configurations once they’ve grown accustomed to what they have. But as with any rehab equipment selection, a client’s overall needs and lifestyle need to be considered — which can make the situation very complex indeed.
“I was in Charlotte just a few weeks ago, and I saw a gentleman who’s probably about 30 going into a power chair for the first time,” Jackson says. “I was surprised actually to see him going into a rear-wheel drive. And so I asked the provider why they had fitted him for a rear-wheel over center-wheel, because you usually see new injuries going into center-wheel.
“He agreed with me, but he said this client was very unique in that he has a lot of pain, and he can feel any kind of a bump while he’s driving his chair. The rear-wheel drive had better suspension than the center-wheel drive, especially for being outdoors. So that’s why they selected the rear-wheel drive.”
Verrett adds that funding issues also have to be carefully considered, which can require providers to do some strategic forecasting: “You have to be able to see around corners and really envision what’s going to happen to this product over its lifespan and provide the most functional accommodations possible. You have to think those things through. As a provider, they have to communicate very well on a high level with the consumer they work with so the expectations of both are mutually understood.”
Since funding sources typically expect power chairs to last three to five years or more, providers may have to predict not only how the client will grow or change, but also how the chair’s environment may change as a result.
“If I were evaluating someone today who was 15 or 17 years old, we would have to consider the possibility that they might go to college,” Verrett says as anexample. “What would they need on a college campus environment? (Then) prepare the product for the lifespan of the funding cycle and its maximum ability to meet that individual’s needs.”
In the end, the “right” drivetrain choice can largely come down to what the client deems the most comfortable — physically, environmentally, emotionally.
“It really starts with the needs and requirements of the individual,” Verrett says of the assessment process. “That’s where I would start.”
While power chair drivetrain talk usually revolves around the three major choices – center-/mid-wheel, front-wheel and rear-wheel drives – there are other choices.
Manufacturers of all-terrain wheelchairs boast their products can go where other power chairs cannot, including treacherous and uneven terrains.
For instance, Innovation In Motion’s Extreme 4x4, aka X4, is “a true four-wheel-drive wheelchair that utilizes four independent motors and four low-pressure knobby tires,” says the company’s Rick Michael. “The X4 steers more like a car than a conventional wheelchair.” He adds that the four-wheel-drive chair is capable of “traversing sand, snow, mud and other soft terrains that conventional wheelchairs cannot.”
Tracabout’s IRV 2000, on the other hand, uses a track system that can run “in full flat position for snow or mud, and half track for normal running in sand or grass,” according to the company’s product information. IRV 2000 also features a “three-point mode suitable for smooth surfaces and carpet.”
And Independence Technology’s iBOT can operate in “Standard” function as a rear-wheel-drive chair, or in “4-Wheel” function, during which “the caster(s) are lifted off the ground and the four drive wheels are all placed on the ground, which acts more like a mid- or center-wheel chair,” says Independence Technology’s Sandy Salerno. The chair’s “Balance” function keeps the back two wheels on the ground while the other wheels rise; in the “Stair” function, the front two drive wheels rotate over the back drive wheels to enable the chair to climb stairs or steps. In the two-wheel formation, the iBOT uses gyroscopes to stay upright.
These “other” drive configurations have a couple of things in common, including clients who are active, particularly outdoors.
“The common denominator for all X4 users is not male/female, young/old, nor rural/urban,” Michael says. “The common denominator is that our users are active. They are parents that want to participate in family functions like sports, picnics on the beach, or just family time in the backyard; college students on campus; owners of landscaping, construction, and other such demanding businesses; and yes, disabled farmers, hunters and other active users that don’t live on a slab of concrete!”
Another commonality: Funding for these off-the-beaten path drivetrains can be challenging.
“The X4 was coded as a K0004 before the new wheelchair codes came out,” Michael says. “Now the minimum speed requirement for a Group 4 wheelchair is 6.5 mph, and the X4’s maximum speed is 5 mph. Without coding, Medicare/Medicaid and many insurance companies are not covering even a portion of the X4.” Michael says, however, that workers’ compensation, the Veterans Administration and vocational rehab have all purchased his all-terrain chairs.
Said Salerno about the iBOT, “In addition (to private insurance), other sources like the workers’ compensation (and) vocational rehabilitation agencies and non-profit organizations have all purchased the iBOT Mobility System for consumers.”
About the author
Laurie Watanabe
Laurie Watanabe is the Editor for Mobility Management.
You can visit the company Web site at mobilitymgmt.com .